![]() In the low PR group, 17/25 of them had a higher win rate in in the Stalingrad, the average win rate in the Stalingrad was 50.4%, and each player, on average, was 2.82% higher in Stalingrad compared to their other t10s. In the most games played group, 21/25 of them had a higher win rate in the Stalingrad, the average win rate in the Stalingrad was 60.9%, and each player, on average, was 5.26% higher than their other t10s. Across all 3 groups the average win rate in Stalingrad was 4.63% higher than the rest of their T10 ships. So 79% of the players looked at are better in the Stalingrad when compared against their other T10 cruisers.ΔΆ. Of the 75 players looked at, 59 had a higher win rate with Stalingrad, 16 had a lower win rate. I then took the win rate of each of those players and compared it against their win rate for all their other t10 cruisers to see the difference. 25 were the players with the most games in the ship, 25 with the highest PR in the ship and 25 with the lowest PR in the ship. ![]() there is a decently wide cross section available now on Wows Numbers so I decided to compare several groups of players to see if there is correlation. They look to see if good players are better in it compared to their other ships and bad players are better in it compared to their other ships. However, we know that WG looks at overperformance and underperformance across groups of players. So no one had any numbers to back up their argument just doesn't work, same as it didn't work for the Flint or the Black. So comparing the Stalingrad agaisnt the Moskva or DM etc. The problem with the Stalingrad is that it is not widely available and typically only good players had it until recently. There is very little middle ground it seems, most people have a strong opinion one way or the other. So the debate about Stalingrad being overpowered has raged for months.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |